Common questions

What are the demerits of a election competition?

What are the demerits of a election competition?

The demerits of electoral competition are as follows: It creates a sense of disunity and factionalism in every locality. Different political parties and leaders often level allegations against each other. Parties and candidates often use ‘dirty tricks’ to win elections.

What are the demerits of election competition class 9?

Demerits of electoral competition are:

  • It creates disunity and factionalism in every locality.
  • Different political Parties and leaders often level allegations against one another.
  • It is often said that the pressure to win electoral fights does not allow sensible long-term policies to be formulated.

What is political competition and its merits and demerits?

READ:   What is the price of Jio phone in 2021?

1) It creates competition among parties to serve the people better. 2)People will have lot of options among various leaders. 3) People acn select a particular leader who can solve their problems. 4) Political Competition mostly benefits the people as parties will do their best to lure the people.

What are the merits and demerits of competition?

What are the merits and demerits of political competition?

  • It creates disunity & factionalism.
  • Candidates often use dirty tricks to discredit their opponents & win elections.
  • Long term policies may become a casualty for electoral politics.

What are the merits and demerits of an electoral competition class 9 CBSE?

(i) An electoral competition creates a sense of disunity and factionalism in every locality. (ii) Different political parties and leaders often level allegations against one another. (iii) Parties and candidates often use dirty tricks to win elections.

What are the three merits and three demerits of an electoral competition?

What are the merits and demerits of democracy Class 9?

A democratic government is a better government because it is a more accountable form of government. Democracy improves the quality of Decision Making. Democracy provides a method to deal with differences and conflicts. Democracy allows people to correct their own mistakes.

READ:   Is Tamil spoken in Mangalore?

Is political competition good in India?

1. Regular electoral competition provides incentives to political parties and leaders. 2. Political parties know that if they raise issues that people want to be raised, their popularity and chances of victory will increase in the next elections.

What are the merits of an electoral competition class 9?

What are the merits of electoral competition

  • This system works better in the long run.
  • It gives every party an equal chance to compete against each other.
  • It leads to the foundation of a well developed society.
  • Regular electoral competition provides incentives to political parties and leaders.

What are the demerits of electoral competition?

Enumerate the demerits of an electoral competition. (i) It creates disunity and factionalism in every locality. People often complain of party-politics. (ii) Different political parties and leaders often level allegations against one another. Parties and candidates often use dirty tricks to win elections.

READ:   Why do they speak English in Asgard?

What are the advantages of political competition?

1. it takes the form of competition among several candidates.. 2. if there was no competitions elections will become pointless 1.The leaders may wish to serve the people as well. 2.Political competition enables the people to reward political leaders for serving them and to punish for not doing so

What are the pros and cons of electrolyte competition in politics?

1) Political leaders are awarded for serving the country and punished for not doing so. 2)Regular electrolyte competition provides incentives to political leaders and parties. 3)It helps to force political leader and parties to serve the people. 1)Creates a sense of disunity and factionalism.

What are the negative effects of electioneering?

1.it creates a sense of disunity and factionalism in every locality. 2.diffrent political parties and leaders often level allegation against one another. 3.parties/candidates often use dirty tricks to win elections. 4.pressure to win electoral fights does not allow sensible long term policies to be formulated.