What did Democritus and Aristotle agree on?

He theorized that all material bodies are made up of indivisibly small “atoms.” Aristotle famously rejected atomism in On Generation and Corruption. Aristotle refused to believe that the whole of reality is reducible to a system of atoms, as Democritus said. As it turned out, though, Democritus was right.

Why were Aristotle’s ideas accepted over those of Democritus?

The important take away point is that Aristotle’s ideas were accepted because he could “prove” them by completing a sort of experiment. Whereas Democritus’ idea of an indivisible atom could not be proved, thus it was quickly rejected.

Why did Aristotle reject Democritus idea of the atom?

Aristotle: He rejected Democritus atomic theroy and didn’t think atoms move through empty spaces because he didn’t think that empty spaces existed. He believed that all matter consisted of four elements. Earth, Air, Water, and Fire.

Did Aristotle and Democritus live in the same time?

The theory of Democritus held that everything is composed of “atoms,” which are physically, but not geometrically, indivisible; that between atoms, there lies empty space; that atoms are indestructible, and have always been and always will be in motion; that there is an infinite number of atoms and of kinds of atoms.

What did Democritus and Aristotle think about the composition of matter?

Democritus. Aristotle disagreed with Democritus and offered his own idea of the composition of matter. According to Aristotle, everything was composed of four elements: earth, air, fire, and water. The theory of Democritus explained things better, but Aristotle was more influential, so his ideas prevailed.

Why were Democritus ideas not accepted?

why were the ideas of Democritus not accepted? Democritus’s ideas were rejected by other philosophers of his time because he could not answer or explain what held atoms together as he did not know. All matter is composed of small particles called atoms. Atoms cannot be destroyed.

How did Democritus contribute to the periodic table?

Democritus’ theory saying that matter is composed of tiny invisible indestructible particles was then called atomic theory. According to Democritus, atoms of every element have always been and always will be in motion, and there is an infinite number of atoms, which differ in shape and size.

How did Democritus and Aristotle’s views differ?

Aristotle disagreed with Democritus and offered his own idea of the composition of matter. According to Aristotle, everything was composed of four elements: earth, air, fire, and water. The theory of Democritus explained things better, but Aristotle was more influential, so his ideas prevailed.

What did Aristotle believe about the atom?

In Aristotle’s time, atomists held that matter was fundamentally constructed out of atoms. These atoms were indivisible and uniform, of various sizes and shapes, and capable only of change in respect of position and motion, but not intrinsic qualities.

In what way do current ideas differ from Democritus ideas about atoms?

A: Modern ideas agree that all matter is made up of extremely small building blocks called atoms. Atoms also aren’t the solid, uncuttable particles Democritus thought. Instead, they consist of several kinds of smaller, simpler particles as well as a lot of empty space.

What were Democritus ideas about atoms?

His famous disciple, Democritus of Abdera, named the building blocks of matter atomos, meaning literally “indivisible,” about 430 bce. Democritus believed that atoms were uniform, solid, hard, incompressible, and indestructible and that they moved in infinite numbers through empty space until stopped.

How did Democritus explain the different properties of substances?

According to Democritus, atoms of different shapes, arranged and positioned differently relative to each other, accounted for the different materials of the world. According to Democritus, the feel and taste of a substance was thought to be the effect of the atoms of the substance on the atoms of our sense organs.