What does the twins paradox tell us about time?

In this supposed paradox, one of two twins travels at near the speed of light to a distant star and returns to the earth. The paradox lies in the question “Why is the traveling brother younger?” Special relativity tells us that an observed clock, traveling at a high speed past an observer, appears to run more slowly.

Why the twin in a rocket ship looks younger than the other twin after 60 years does time on Earth differ on the time in the outer space why?

After all, the twin on Earth can invoke time dilation: Moving clocks go slower, and so do the clocks of the moving twin. On these slower-moving clocks – and, by extension, in the whole spaceship – less time passes than on Earth, in other words: when the travelling twin returns, he is younger.

What is the twin paradox example?

For example, suppose that one of two identical twin sisters flies off into space at nearly the speed of light. According to relativity, time runs more slowly on her spacecraft than it does on Earth; therefore, when she returns to Earth, she will be younger than her Earth-bound sister.

Has the twin paradox been proven?

The twin paradox is real as the traveling twin will see the Earth clock moving as slowly as the twin on the Earth. Yes, it is real but shouldn’t really be called a paradox.

Is the twin paradox real?

Why twin paradox is not a paradox?

Another way of looking at it is by realising that the travelling twin is undergoing acceleration, which makes him a non-inertial observer. In both views there is no symmetry between the spacetime paths of the twins. Therefore, the twin paradox is not a paradox in the sense of a logical contradiction.

Why is the twin paradox only apparent?

The answer is that the paradox is only apparent, for the situation is not appropriately treated by special relativity. To return to Earth the spacecraft must change direction, which violates the condition of steady straight-line motion central to special relativity.

Why is twin paradox false?

As Gabby has been travelling at a high speed, she would have experienced the effects of relativity. In such a scenario, it is the traveling twin that would be younger and it is illogical to state that both of them were younger than the other. Only one of them can be right and hence the contradiction, the twin paradox.

Why is twin paradox not a paradox?