What is the significance of not knowing the jurors names?
Table of Contents
- 1 What is the significance of not knowing the jurors names?
- 2 What is the significance of the last scene in 12 Angry Men?
- 3 What is the setting in which the reader first meets the twelve characters who give the play its name?
- 4 How did 12 Angry Men vote?
- 5 What happens at the end of the play Twelve Angry Men?
- 6 How angry were the jurors in the movie The Crucible?
What is the significance of not knowing the jurors names?
— The federal judge in a 1987 extortion trial for reputed Philadelphia mob boss Nicodemo “Little Nicky” Scarfo told jurors they have been kept anonymous “to make sure that you would not have any apprehensions about your safety or the safety of your families or anything else.” This practice has been used in other …
Which juror is a watchmaker 12 Angry Men?
The Jury
| Juror No. | Character | Actor |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | An immigrant watchmaker, he is observant and believes in the American justice system. | Edward James Olmos |
| 12 | An ad executive; he is easily swayed by others’ opinions, and does not have a full understanding of the life at stake. | William Petersen |
Why is the setting important in 12 Angry Men?
This drama by Reginald Rose, set in New York City during the summertime in the 1950s in a court jury room, gives the reader a firsthand view of the suspense, or uncertainty and anxiety the reader feels, found in that jury room as well as the many different personalities that affect the outcome of any jury verdict.
What is the significance of the last scene in 12 Angry Men?
After convincing the jury to give a Not Guilty verdict, Juror #8 walks over to #3, his nemesis, and puts his coat on for him. The gesture shows us that despite the extent to which they’ve argued in the jury room, there will be no hard feelings once they head back into the world.
Why does Juror 3 change his vote 12 Angry Men?
Juror 3 changed his vote after realizing that all of his anger toward the defendant was a direct result of his bad relationship with his son. Due to his change of vote from guilty to not guilty, Juror 3 shows growth in character and is therefore considered dynamic.
Why does juror 12 change his vote?
He changes his vote initially because many of the other jurors have, but they convince him he should do it because he believes the boy might not be guilty. Juror Eight – Protagonist of the play, he is the first one to stand up for the boy and say he might not be guilty.
What is the setting in which the reader first meets the twelve characters who give the play its name?
What is the setting in which the reader first meets the twelve characters who give the play its name? The jury room in a New York court.
Which juror is particularly anxious to reach a quick decision Why?
In Twelve Angry Men, the juror who wishes to hurry the vote is Juror No. 7. A loud and superficial man, Juror No. 7 is a sarcastic salesman who is quick to form opinions.
Why did Juror 3 change his vote?
How did 12 Angry Men vote?
It’s clear there’s something weighing on him. The jurors all sit down and take a vote. Eleven of them vote Guilty, and Juror #8 is the only person who votes Not Guilty. The verdict has to be unanimous, so the men all sigh and try to convince Juror #8 why he’s wrong.
What was ultimately the reason why juror #3 was so inflexible in his belief on the kid’s guilt?
What was ultimately the reason why juror number three was so inflexible about his belief and the kid’s guilt? He thought that every single thing in that court said he was guilty. If he he had realized what he thought earlier, then they all could have decided quicker.
Who changed the most in 12 Angry Men?
The main thing which causes most of the jurors to change their vote is Juror Eight’s call for further examination of the evidence. Juror Nine changes his vote because he is impressed by Eight’s courage in offering a contrarian view and wants to re-examine the evidence too.
What happens at the end of the play Twelve Angry Men?
Reginald Rose’s drama “Twelve Angry Men” ends with the jury agreeing that there is enough reasonable doubt to warrant an acquittal. The defendant is deemed “not guilty” by a jury of his peers. However, the playwright never reveals the truth behind the case. Did they save an innocent man from the electric chair?
Do jurors in 12 Angry Men know each other by name?
Throughout the film 12 Angry Men (1957) (as well as the other plays and films, I assume) the jurors do not know each other by name, only number. That is until the final scene when jurors 8 (the protagonist) and 9 (the old man) share their names of Davis and McCardle, respectively.
Who was Henry Fonda in 12 Angry Men?
Henry Fonda, the leader, came across as somewhat low key, but he certainly held strong convictions. The jurors played by Lee J. Cobb and Ed Begley were angry throughout the entire film. “12 Angry Men” is a strong and interesting title. It expresses the environment of the jurors in their deliberations perfectly.
How angry were the jurors in the movie The Crucible?
As I reflect on the 12 jurors, the only juror that did not express anger at some point was no. 11 or 12- the young advertising exec played by Robert Webber. Henry Fonda, the leader, came across as somewhat low key, but he certainly held strong convictions. The jurors played by Lee J. Cobb and Ed Begley were angry throughout the entire film.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4XnpEutPBY