Who believed that there should be no separation between politics and religion?

John Locke
Reverting back to liberalism, John Locke expressed his ideas in: A letter concerning Toleration (1689), it should be noted that Locke never mentions a separation of religion and politics, he tends to speak more about the ‘difference’ between the ‘Church and the State’ (Locke, 1947:47).

How can a relationship between religion and politics be established?

The relationship between religion and politics can be established by setting up the following constitutional provisions: and propagate any religion, or not to follow any. At the same time, the Constitution allows the state to intervene in matters of religion in order to ensure equality within religious communities.

Why is it important to separate religion from politics?

According to the study material, religion should be kept separate from the State because: It enables the country to function democratically. The people belonging to the minority communities can otherwise be harmed by the domination of the majority and there can be an infringement of the Fundamental Rights.

Why should we separate religion from state?

Religion is too important to be a government program or a political pageant. The concept of a “separation of church and state” reinforces the legal right of a free people to freely live their faith, even in public; without fear of government coercion. Free exercise means you may have a faith and you may live it.

How can the relationship between politics and religion be beneficial?

(i) Influence of religion can make politics value based. (ii) Religious communities can politically express their needs and interests. (iii) Political authorities can monitor and control religious discrimination and oppression.

What is the relationship between religion and politics?

The relation between religion and politics continues to be an important theme in political philosophy, despite the emergent consensus (both among political theorists and in practical political contexts, such as the United Nations) on the right to freedom of conscience and on the need for some sort of separation between church and state.

Should we talk about religion and politics in polite company?

Haliburton is not alone. He was merely expressing what many modern Westerners think: we shouldn’t talk about religion and politics in polite company, especially if the two subjects are joined together and more so if the people in the room do not agree. This sort of common wisdom is well-intentioned but wrong.

Is religion playing too much role in politics?

Asked by Mr. Schieffer if he thought religion was playing too much of a role in politics, the cardinal said, “No, I don’t think so at all.” “The public square in the United States is always enriched whenever people approach it when they’re inspired by their deepest held convictions,” he said.

Is the separation of church and state a good idea?

The separation of church and state is certainly a major advance in human history and political theory. Under no circumstances should religious leaders ever be given political power merely because they are part of a religious hierarchy. Iran provides the latest example of how theocracy always corrupts both religion and politics.