What is the difference between cutting the tree and killing the tree?

There is a difference between cutting a tree and killing a tree. Trees can be cut off from its stem or trunk and can remain alive as their root system remains active. If we uproot a tree then the tree will die which will called the killing of a tree.

Is the title on killing a tree?

The title of the poem is simple and appropriate as it contains the major concern of the poet – merciless and callous felling of trees. It indicates appropriately that the poem is about the process of killing of the tree. The entire poem explains the view that killing a tree is not a simple, short or easy process.

What is the meaning of on killing a tree?

“On Killing a Tree” is a sensitive poem. The poet persuades the reader not to destroy trees and equates it with “killing” a human being. He says that a plant takes sunlight, water, air and nutrients from the soil to gradually become a huge tree. It develops a strong trunk and gets numerous leaves.

What is the difference between killing and inflicting pain according to the poet?

To kill the tree, it is essential that the root, which is the source of a tree’s life, must be pulled out of its deep hole in the earth. By ‘earth-cave’ the poet suggests the space created in the earth by uprooting a tree. Once the centre, the life source – the root – is exposed, the tree becomes vulnerable.

What are the two important stages for killing a tree?

There are two stages of killing a tree. First, the tree should be pulled out entirely. Its roots are to be exposed to the sun and the air. Secondly, the roots are to be scorched in the sun.

Why does the poet say killing a tree rather than cutting it?

A) The poet uses the expression ‘to kill’ rather than ‘to cut’ as he wants to equate the life of a tree with the life of a human being. After cutting the tree the different parts of the tree like bark, twigs will grow to their former size if left unchecked.

Is the title on killing a tree apt justify 120 words?

Answer: The title, ‘On Killing a Tree’ is ironical, and is apt and justified. The tree has been personified by the poet Gieve Patel. He laments the deforestation that is taking place.

Is the title on killing a tree apt justify?

In this poem, the poet describes how man encourages deforestation, defying the eternal bond shared by the earth and the tree. While hacking and chopping, trees do not die but bleed. This signifies that they are living beings.

What is the irony of the poem on killing a tree?

The irony in the poem On Killing A Tree is that the nature which makes our existence possibly is being destroyed by us. The trees are the integral part of earth. They preserve nature and keep our planet healthy. Destroying them will destroy our nature.

What is the critical appreciation of the poem on killing a tree?

The poem, overall, speaks to the fact that it is harder to kill a tree than “a simple jab of the knife.” In the end, killing a tree is very difficult. One must pull the tree out by the roots, expose “the strength of the tree,” and allow the sun and the air to choke the life out of it.

What are the two ideas that the poet suggests through his poem on killing a tree?

The poem “On Killing a Tree” by Gieve Patel presents the sturdiness of a fully grown tree, strengthened by nourishment from the earth, the sun and the air. The poem also depicts the survival instinct of a strong tree which refuses to die even when its trunk and branches have been chopped off.

How does the poet describe the methods of killing a tree in the poem on killing a tree?

In the poem ‘On Killing a Tree’, the poet Give Patel describes how a tree is tortured by man for its complete annihilation. Killing a tree is a difficult task because a tree grows slowly by consuming the earth and absorbing sunlight and air. It cannot be killed by a simple jab of knife, or even by hacking and chopping.

What is the meaning of the poem on killing a tree?

On Killing a Tree Summary “On Killing a Tree” is a sensitive poem. The poet persuades the reader not to destroy trees and equates it with “killing” a human being. He says that a plant takes sunlight, water, air and nutrients from the soil to gradually become a huge tree.

What is the difference between a murder and a killing?

• A murder is a killing of a human being that is planned and intentional, whereas killing is a generic term that is used more in accidental killing.

Does cutting the trunk of a tree kill it?

Merely cutting the trunk of the tree does not kill it. When a tree is cut, the sap flows out just like a wounded man bleeds. Once the wound heals, new branches and tiny leaves grow from there which grow into trees. In order to destroy a tree, it has to be uprooted.

Why should trees not be cut down?

He equates trees with humans to convey that trees should not be cut because destroying trees is just like killing a human being. A tree does not die by merely cutting because it regrows from where it is cut. If it has to be destroyed, then it has to be uprooted. Will do it. It has grown Sprouting leaves. A simple cut does not destroy a tree.